Maritime systems such as cruise ships and frigates comprise several million components, far exceeding the magnitude of other industrial products. This poses particular challenges for shipyards in terms of production planning and control. Which is why the Lürssen shipyard group, the Machine Tool Laboratory (WZL) at RWTH University in Aachen and PROSTEP AG carried out the ProProS research project. The project focused on developing an innovative methodology for planning and controlling the production of large individual products. The methodology is intended to enable the efficient use of available resources and the earliest possible assessment of the impact of disruptions. It is based on a digital twin that maps the ship and the production activities. In this twin, the activity plan is created without manual intervention based on the ship structure and it is planned and optimized with due consideration given to the available resources.
The software demonstrator created as part of the research project can handle the very large structures and activity plans found in the shipbuilding industry. The transfer of real-time data from production makes it possible for the production planners to rapidly detect incidents and replan the production process based on the current status. This provides them with a tool that increases efficiency in the production process and shortens throughput times. The software can even be used to make predictions about future activities.
The solution enables detailed and highly efficient production control when building complex individual products, without driving up the level of manual effort required for production planning.
The project itself was divided into four phases. Following an initial analysis of requirements, during which the technical challenges and constraints were identified, we derived a data and process model, which was transferred to the demonstrator in the third phase. The resulting solution was then validated in the final phase of the project. The project partners carried out all phases in close coordination with each other, while the primary responsibility in each phase was determined by the partners' respective strengths.